PC to the point of stupidity

Jim Lileks, in this morning's bleat:


"But what do I know. I’m so out of touch I saw that picture of the Marlboro Man
soldier and did not instantly fire off a letter to the editor protesting this
flagrant and unhelpful depiction of – what’s the word? - reality. Some did, of course. (One of many examples I've seen about.) For God’s sake, if Patton were alive today he’d be slapping civilians. Granted, we’re talking about a select stratum of the population whose undies come pre-bunched, but even by their standards this is ridiculous. You get the sense that this was the last straw for some – it’s bad
enough that we have soldiers in Iraq (if we have to have soldiers AT ALL) but to
have conspicuously smoking soldiers just rubs their nose in it all. It’s stuff
like this that makes the standard imagery of WW2 look like dispatches from an
alternate dimension, and makes you wonder how the modern media might have
covered WW2. You can well imagine the reports from Normandy: the reporter would
have his back to the sea so the camera caught the wreckage, the metal flotsam,
the blasted craft and bobbing bodies. The terrible toll of this horrible day. At
the end of the report the camera might have swung around to see the beach we had
secured, and the Nazi positions high above we’d taken, but that would be an
asterisk to the Dreadful Cost that led Many to Wonder whether this Invasion was
not a Gamble whose Final Cost was Yet to be Tallied, etc. Close-up on a soldier
shivering on the sand, sucking down a Camel. Cue the letter to the
Herald-Examiner from an anti-smoking activist: it is ironic that we continue to
associate cigarettes with heroism and manliness, when that soldier faces far
more danger from his cigarette than from the upcoming battles in the hedgerows,
the attempt to take French villages, the desperate push to unite the front and
deal with the German tanks held in reserve, the frigid hell of Bastogne and the
messy sniper-salted drive to Berlin. And why do we have to show the soldiers
with guns? What sort of message does this send? It should be no surprise that
our children play Allies and Nazis these days, instead of Ministers and
Diplomats. "

Comments

Anonymous said…
Your site Joe, I found to be very interesting. When I was searching for Marlboro Cigarette Home Page yours was the most eyecatching. While working on my site Marlboro Cigarette Home Page I have been seeking ways to make it better and found yours to be helpful. Thanks!
5:30 PM
Anonymous said…
Your site Joe, I found to be very interesting. When I was searching for 2005 Marlboro Miles Catalog yours was the most eyecatching. While working on my site 2005 Marlboro Miles Catalog I have been seeking ways to make it better and found yours to be helpful. Thanks!
2:03 AM
Anonymous said…
Your site Joe, I found to be very interesting. When I was searching for Marlboro Ranch yours was the most eyecatching. While working on my site Marlboro Ranch I have been seeking ways to make it better and found yours to be helpful. Thanks!
2:04 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The other side of Porkbusters, the people who need pork

Here in Alaska the governor is discussing a PR campaign would attempt to tell the rest of the US that Alaska is not just a consumer of Federal money, and it would "tell Alaska's story": (from a column by Beth Bragg) The governor wants to "tell Alaska's story" to the Lower 48 so folks down there have a better idea of what it's like up here. The goal is to end the ridicule we've been so good at inspiring lately, what with our bridges to you-know-where and our desire to drill for oil in a wildlife refuge. The thinking goes like this: If we can educate the critics with pictures of a desolate ANWR and defuse the comedians with pictures of a serene and congenial Ted Stevens, then we can move on to our ultimate goal, which is building bridges to you-know-where and drilling for oil in a wildlife refuge. Or as the Governor actually said: "Alaska does not just take. We give, and we have the capacity to give much, much more -- if permitted to do so,&
Read more

Haditha slant in the press

Image
There's not much actual information out in the press about what really happened in Haditha, but most of what has come out is highly slanted against the marines. The only data point I've seen is an interview with the lance corporal who survived the initial IED explosion. Here's a summary of the interview here: (RHCP) (video here ) Again, here's a summary of the salient facts that Crossan related: 1) The Marines knew there was going to be an attack on the command outpost, which would explain the high degree of suspicion about the Iraqi's in a taxi that first refused to stop, then ran away from them. 2) There was an IED attack on his humvee, and a squad was sent in 3) Insurgents began firing on the Marines almost immediately. 4) He's not claiming to have witnessed anything. The first slant that has already been pointed out in several places (hotair), is in the times online from london, where they grabbed one quote from Corporal Crossan , “were blinded by ha
Read more

Moving on up

I'm changing URL's for this blog, I started to when we moved to colombia, but I never really have time. Please update your links. http://farsouthofi-10.blogspot.com/
Read more